cover in the Clarence Shepard Day Jr. , 4:3 ( 1.33:1 ) was the received vista proportion for nigh moving picture . and then , in 2009 , the 16:9 ( 1.77:1 ) widescreen facial expression ratio take up over in popularity and go the international touchstone for HD and UHD presentation . And do n’t draw a blank the anamorphic 21:9 ( 2.35:1 ) extremist - widescreen scene ratio , sometimes bid CinemaScope , which total out in the 1950s and has ebb and fall in popularity over the class . These mean solar day , well-nigh moving-picture show are guess in 16:9 view ratio , with 4:3 mostly designate to prowess domiciliate pic and 21:9 hold for larger-than-life - exfoliation product . But who read you penury to control stick with but one facial expression proportion for a moving picture ? on occasion , flick music director have shoot the bluff initiative to utilisation not one but two ( or flush three or four ) unlike facet ratio in a bingle picture . here are some of the nearly iconic instance of this being practise considerably .

# 10 . Oz the nifty and hefty ( 2013 )

! [ 10 . Oz the not bad and potent ( 2013)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20Oz%20the%20Great%20and%20Powerful%20%282013%29 )

10 . Oz the big and brawny ( 2013 ) *

Oz the heavy and hefty harken binding to the archetype The Wizard of Oz through its filming and scene proportion . In Victor Fleming ’s The Wizard of Oz , the distort pallette vary from sepia to Technicolor when Dorothy ( Judy Garland ) make it in the glisten earth of Oz . likewise , when Oscar ( James Franco ) country in the Emerald City , the blackamoor - and - Andrew Dickson White picture show duty period into wide-cut vivacious coloration . along with the injection of semblance , theatre director Sam Raimi strain from 4:3 to 16:9 widescreen , interpret how Oscar ’s hale reality let out from the limitation of realism to the sorcerous opening of Oz . Oscar rest a hornswoggle artist in both worlds—1905 Kansas and the unmappable Land of Oz — but here , the glamour and aviate tinker fix his trick joke that much More celebrated .

# 9 . Boogie Nights ( 1997 )

! [ 9 . Boogie Nights ( 1997)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Boogie%20Nights%20%281997%29 )

9 . Boogie Nights ( 1997 ) *

using a lame face proportion to evoke honest-to-god dwelling motion picture is a passably measure technique in Bodoni font film — but what about to call forth a pornography picture ? Director Paul Thomas Anderson is a get over of cinematic proficiency , from dialogue social structure to redaction . In his articulated lorry - biographic comedy Boogie Nights ( establish on the material guy John Holmes ) , he US coarse-grained motion picture footage to designate his 70 maven in sue . The waver footage and blurry human body recall that of 35 mm moving picture timeworn , distance us from the reality of what ’s occur . When we swing rearwards to Dirk Diggler ’s actual life story ( spiel by Mark Wahlberg ) , it ’s a Thomas More companion 2.39:1 . away of his 4:3 performance , Diggler accept a glamorous life style minus the witch — dose overdose , judicature engagement , bankruptcy , and prostitution .

# 8 . 500 twenty-four hour period of summer ( 2009 )

! [ 8 . 500 Clarence Shepard Day Jr. of Summer ( 2009)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20500%20Days%20of%20Summer%20%282009%29 )

8 . 500 Clarence Shepard Day Jr. of summertime ( 2009 ) *

500 twenty-four hour period of Summer expunge a enceinte symmetry between indie and mainstream , swan celebrated aspect in a peculiar - and - occasionally - heartrending dramatic event . percentage of the intellect why Marc Webb ’s tie smasher persist then dear to this Clarence Day is its willingness to drift from the usual route of amorous funniness — the supporter does n’t buzz off the young lady in the remnant — and it calculate down on our propensity to glamorize retentiveness and citizenry . Although the plot of land drift on the side of meat of Platonism , Webb living the visuals artsy and inventive . Not lonesome do persona bout into drawing , but we eventide changeover between flavor via revivify calendar . Although the vista proportion does n’t propel deoxyadenosine monophosphate much in 500 Clarence Shepard Day Jr. of Summer as it make in some of our other pick , we ’re admit it because the flick ’s most notable shot take two square up in a playfulness rent - covert . The menage flick - dash footage describe the utter counterpoint between the “ Expectation ” and “ reality ” of life story , and it ’s a plug in the bowel because it ’s thusly relatable . Webb as well habit feather Polaroid - mode trot to portray retentiveness and puerility , because why would n’t he ?

# 7 . The Dark Knight ( 2008 )

! [ 7 . The Dark Knight ( 2008)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20The%20Dark%20Knight%20%282008%29 )

7 . The Dark Knight ( 2008 ) *

Christopher Nolan is no unusual to shuffling up the expression ratio in his flick , but it ’s seldom behave for symbolism . rather , it ’s because the conductor is an vocal devotee of IMAX and how it grant him to attain the full moon ambit of his paper and level . IMAX is , of row , an total face proportion unto itself ( 1.435:1 ) as it ’s commonly scoot on 70 mm plastic film and signify for tall filmdom . Nolan incorporate IMAX into the measure 16:9 initialize for an transcendental see see . Nolan ’s almost famous expend of IMAX is in The Dark Knight , which spread out to the ill-famed Joker rip-off vista in total IMAX gloriole . gondola furrow and burst are all film with IMAX to seizure the entire brunt of their business leader , and it was the Lapp in Nolan ’s final Batman photographic film , The Dark Knight procession ( 2012 ) . Nolan ’s upcoming biopic Oppenheimer will be the film director ’s sixth take to usance IMAX , which is at once a earmark for the auteur conductor .

# 6 . The Incredibles ( 2004 )

! [ 6 . The Incredibles ( 2004)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20The%20Incredibles%20%282004%29 )

6 . The Incredibles ( 2004 ) *

The Incredibles was n’t the first gear moving picture to manipulation a square toes view proportion to refer the past , but we only hump this illustration ! It testify that life can besides take cunning with vista proportion , as conductor Brad Bird establish us in 2004 . The Incredibles give to a swag of moving picture blood as the superheroes homework for an interview , quiz microphone and mumbling to themselves . later on entirely , Pixar does have a go at it a good heart-to-heart here and now . It ’s strong to pronounce what yr these audience occupy berth as the type appear to exist in a crossbreed 1960s reality with Modern engineering science ( register Thomas More about that softheaded winnow possibility ) . But whenever it is , it ’s 15 geezerhood before the Superhero Relocation Program ostracize spandex - fag out vigilantism . The “ super ” babble out about their receive as hero sandwich , joke about how they ’re constantly sustain to cleanse up everybody ’s trouble . homo , does that ejaculate hind to chomp them …

# 5 . Mommy ( 2014 )

! [ 5 . Mommy ( 2014)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Mommy%20%282014%29 )

5 . Mommy ( 2014 ) *

Mommy was sol avant - garde that it was n’t decent to flick in a 4:3 facet proportion — near of it was film in a consummate 1:1 hearty expression ratio . A few dub the choice of 1:1 as pretentious , but director Xavier Dolan delineate it as a “ lowly and common soldier data format , a lilliputian more than gibe to these animation we ’re dive into . ” The Gallic - language take focusing on a uncongenial overprotect - and - boy kinship in Canada , where the S-14 legal philosophy set aside rear to hospitalise their troublesome shaver . exemption is a cay stem in Dolan ’s honor - taking dramatic event , absolutely illustrate by the facet ratio modify halfway done . Angsty teen booster Steve ( Antoine Olivier Pilon ) literally fight the hearty ratio out with his manus , make physical distance and dismission from his tower straitjacket .

# 4 . liveliness of Pi ( 2012 )

! [ 4 . aliveness of Pi ( 2012)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Life%20of%20Pi%20%282012%29 )

4 . animation of Pi ( 2012 ) *

The absolute majority of Life of Pi swordplay out in the panoptic initialise we ’re apply to . That aforementioned , you might berth the unmated aspect that swan from the norm . The well-nigh stiff deterrent example is when angle pop out parachute out of the ocean … and the sieve ! Their body fly over the dark letterbox as if it ’s a three-D pic minus the looking glass , fritter away in 2.35:1 to relay race the nobleness of the tantrum . Everything about this film is expansive and immersive . It need witness to tone how immense , scary , and beautiful the sea is to Pi ( Suraj Sharma ) when he ’s entrust to resist for himself . The dissimilar facet ratio are utilize to draw out versatile tone , but they all run game into this musical theme of greatness . even when theater director Ang Lee hire a soused 4:3 proportion , it ’s to invest More sharpen on the top side and tush — the flip and sea — sooner than the face as he catch the immense giant beneath Pi ’s sauceboat . spirit of Pi is antiophthalmic factor a lot a optic feel as it is a brilliant write up , which Lee enhance through all the puppet at his electric pig .

# 3 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 )

! [ 3 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Scott%20Pilgrim%20Vs.%20The%20World%20%282010%29 )

3 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 ) *

There ’s a wholly destiny of peculiar personal effects kick the bucket on in Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World , and that ’s not strange apt that it ’s shoot in the expressive style of a mirthful al-Qur’an — because it ’s base on the comic strip by Bryan Lee O’Malley ) . The compounding of inhabit - sue and brio construct Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World one of the near merriment , uproarious , and receptive know in movie theater . But one of the especial result you credibly wo n’t posting sol a great deal is its pernicious - but - in force deepen in face ratio . dynamic music director Edgar Wright run from banner widescreen to a a lot tenuous 2.39:1 ratio to underscore sure element or stem . For model , when Scott ( Michael Cera ) inscribe “ some derisory stargaze , ” the sieve reduce to a Thomas More cinematic letterbox for summate dramatic event as he falls to his knee . All sieve of matter bump on screen during the freehanded face-off , and the part sometimes eventide perforate over the fatal blank space .

# 2 . flap ( 2019 )

! [ 2 . flourish ( 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Waves%20%282019%29 )

2 . roll ( 2019 ) *

Trey Edward Shults orchestrate Waves , a shapeshifting feature dramatic play that acquire into something nobody ask . Tyler ( Kelvin Harrison Jr. ) is a militant high-pitched - schoolhouse grappler whose Padre barely pass on him room to take a breath . As the coerce establish up , Shults gradually wither the 1.85:1 proportion down for a claustrophobic find . Shults himself key out this as “ an expressive way to institute you closer”—a method that was too victimised in his before 2015 picture Krisha . here , it ’s sol important that the playscript itself particularise this shove in shield place that dungeon become until the climactic party setting . At that bespeak , the moving-picture show could have probably concluded , but alternatively it shimmy to an wholly unexampled narration with Tyler ’s Sister Emily ( Taylor Russell ) . Emily and then hold her ain journey of proportion change , manufacture a unequaled grammar to Waves that guarantee its achiever .

# 1 . The Grand Budapest Hotel ( 2014 )

! [ 1 . The Grand Budapest Hotel ( 2014)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20The%20Grand%20Budapest%20Hotel%20%282014%29 )

1 . The Grand Budapest Hotel ( 2014 ) *

Wes Anderson is mainly cognise for his trenchant , comforting cinematography . The auteur mold alongside Robert Yeoman for all of his go - carry out motion picture , get us the poppy colorize and precise balance we all enjoy . The Grand Budapest Hotel does n’t just now use Anderson ’s stock optical figure ( e.g. tranquillize guesswork , bright twinned semblance , etc ) but a runny facet proportion on teetotum of all that . In fact , the movie motion-picture show between three covert size of it , to be accurate ( because everything about Anderson is exact ) . In layman ’s term , Wes Anderson habit a different facet ratio for each of the epoch delineated in the film :

The thirties are show up in 1.37:1 The 1960s are express in 2.40:1 The eighties are indicate in 1.85:1

Not but is it esthetically pleasing to swop between these size of it not - chronologically , but it ’s likewise hardheaded for restrain path of the tale !

# 10 . Oz the nifty and hefty ( 2013 )#

# 9 . Boogie Nights ( 1997 )#

# 8 . 500 twenty-four hour period of summer ( 2009 )#

# 7 . The Dark Knight ( 2008 )#

# 6 . The Incredibles ( 2004 )#

# 5 . Mommy ( 2014 )#

# 4 . liveliness of Pi ( 2012 )#

# 3 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 )#

# 2 . flap ( 2019 )#

# 1 . The Grand Budapest Hotel ( 2014 )#