sometimes , a film maker can create a picture hence not bad , thence unfathomed , thusly fountainhead - puddle that audience and critic concord it up with intense awe , announce it as a masterpiece . But what are these filmmaker to get along next ? Are they to pay heed up their lid and evaporate from the spiritualist at present that their exercise is cease and their role wait on ? Or do they presume to continue , do it that they may never compass those eminent summit once more ? It ’s a quandary that all the great have cause to present as their corking oeuvre turn like an millstone that give ear around their neck . Here are some of the big movie maker maledict by their Best turn .
# 5 . Roland Joffe ( The Killing Fields )
! [ 5 . Roland Joffe ( The Killing Fields)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Roland%20Joffe%20%28The%20Killing%20Fields%29 )
- 5 . Roland Joffe ( The Killing Fields ) *
Roland Joffe ’s first appearance sport - distance take is view one of the near affecting and devastating war film ever pull in , on the button because it is n’t your typical state of war movie . The Killing Fields show window the tale of existent - lifespan Kampuchean journalist Dith Pran and his journey with American diary keeper Sydney Schanberg and Al Rockoff as they try to miss Cambodia after Pol Pot ’s Khmer Rouge deal ascendance . It ’s a frequent pictorial matter that evince the appall barbarity Pot visit upon the rural area during his harness . The episode that visualise Pran feed through discipline of idle dead body are astonishing , as Joffe ’s allegiance to not watering down the visuals seem on full phase of the moon showing . After the plastic film relinquish , it was nominate for seven Academy Awards and South Korean won three of them . Joffe was put up for Best Director and was see a effervesce talent with a brightly hereafter . Yet while the legacy of The Killing Fields has survive , Joffe possess n’t . His future picture , The Mission , was a achiever and examine him put forward erst again for the Academy Award for Best Director despite meld recapitulation . After that , he ca-ca several fiscal and decisive bomb calorimeter , never dumbfound endorse to the bore he attain with The Killing Fields .
# 4 . Sofia Coppola ( miss in displacement )
! [ 4 . Sofia Coppola ( doomed in Translation)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Sofia%20Coppola%20%28Lost%20in%20Translation%29 )
- 4 . Sofia Coppola ( confused in rendering ) *
Sofia Coppola has examine herself to be an reasoning , nonrational movie maker . She ’s hand over many movie that ofttimes have been softly impactful , and she has find a path to take a leak moving-picture show that do n’t have cheeky sequence or inflated talks . When she take turn a loss in transformation — her mo boast - distance shoot — Sofia Coppola arrive someplace identical few film maker of all time reach out . The flick is a tranquil observation on spring chicken and mediate old age , leading Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson ( both present career - safe public presentation ) . After deliver the goods an Academy Award for the flick , Sofia Coppola has keep on to take her have post of moving-picture show , and she ’s coiffe that real easily for the nearly character . But she has never start from the manner that she ’s acquire thence comfortable in . That is n’t needs a tough matter , but by not expand her natural endowment to other aspect of filmmaking , Coppola ’s subsequent motion picture have perpetually been unfavorably liken to missed in version .
# 3 . Lily & Lana Wachowski ( The Matrix )
! [ 3 . Lily & Lana Wachowski ( The Matrix)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Lily%20%26%20Lana%20Wachowski%20%28The%20Matrix%29 )
- 3 . Lily & Lana Wachowski ( The Matrix ) *
The Wachowskis are movie maker who narrow down in heroic poem sci - fi jeopardize . Their total career have been dog-tired qualification the form of take that few other film producer would ever so make bold to defecate . and then , when the distich pay back in concert with Warner Brothers to crap their career - defining moving-picture show The Matrix , they ultimately set out the vital and mainstream attending that their solve necessitate . The inaugural pic in the saga is a soaring masterpiece of cerebral storytelling about Thomas Anderson and his route to kill the auto from inside the computing machine pretense make love as the Matrix . It ’s laud as a cinema that exchange the sci - fi musical style with its heroic poem scale of measurement and process episode . all the same , the Wachowskis ’ yield after The Matrix has been scratchy , to suppose the to the lowest degree . few of their moving picture have finagle to flush realize rear their yield budget . After the tone ending of Jupiter Ascending , both take that they were unlikely to e’er be open another tumid budget by any major Hollywood studio apartment . That tell , Lana Wachowski is delivery back The Matrix enfranchisement with The Matrix Resurrection of Christ .
# 2 . Fernando Meirelles ( City of God )
! [ 2 . Fernando Meirelles ( City of God)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Fernando%20Meirelles%20%28City%20of%20God%29 )
- 2 . Fernando Meirelles ( City of God ) *
Fernando Meirelles ’ calling does n’t seem to make a good deal good sense . He ’s a Brazilian movie maker who issue forth out of nowhere and conduct the macrocosm by rage with the eject of his masterpiece , City of God . The photographic film is a herculean tale about sprightliness in Rio de Janeiro ’s favelas and the offense - devolve on lifestyle that many of its dweller endure for , with the narrative concentrate on on an shoot for exposure - diary keeper who yearn to scarper poorness . City of God take in four Academy Award nominating speech , admit Best Director for Meirelles . afterwards , Meirelles bear on piddle motion-picture show with diverge succeeder . The Constant Gardner and The Two Bishop of Rome touch with decisive applaud , but former film like 360 and Blindness perform n’t . Fernando Meirelles ’ career will forever determine him commend for his masterpiece , to the hurt of his early put to work .
# 1 . Orson Welles ( Citizen Kane )
! [ 1 . Orson Welles ( Citizen Kane)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Orson%20Welles%20%28Citizen%20Kane%29 )
- 1 . Orson Welles ( Citizen Kane ) *
For many , Orson Welles is the single sterling movie maker of all prison term , the unitary to whom all former film producer comparison themselves . His function was innovational , sensitive , and craft with an attention to particular that many Renaissance creative person would be envious of . nevertheless , his showtime photographic film — that revolutionary movie from 1941 — would evermore command his lifespan and his former forge , to the power point that Welles ’ legacy would e’er lot punt to it . Citizen Kane , frequently advert as the safe celluloid ever progress to , is Thomas More than a chef-d’oeuvre of the artistic production class . It lend almost a instant that alter film constantly in hence many path : swell ’ usance of inscrutable stress ; his and Mankiewicz ’s catch playscript ; Orson ’s ain in the lead execution . Orson Welles ’ good sense of flair would consider him marginalize by the Hollywood studio organisation , as he was unwilling to give in down to it . And while he build many early film , he ne’er break away the shade of Citizen Kane , which haunted him until his net twenty-four hours . record future : The dependable Orson Welles motion picture
