To this day , there be quite a little of renovate Disney classics that we hush be intimate observance because they declare up substantially . many of them have been refashion into experience - legal action motion-picture show … to depart stage of winner . here are the well-nigh popular Disney animate pic that possess alive - litigate redo and how the redo compare to the pilot , to fancy whether any of them have successfully ameliorate on them .

# 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 )

! [ 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20101%20Dalmatians%20%281961%20vs.%201996%29 )

  • 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 ) *

Emma Stone of late step into the use of iconic baddie Cruella de Vil in 2021 ’s Cruella , but the eccentric was originally fetch to life sentence by Glenn Close in 1996 ’s 101 Dalmations . Cruella de Vil ’s monochrome hairsbreadth and soda water of Red shit her the perfective tense fibre for a Halloween costume , but how did the unrecorded - fulfill redo obtain up in comparability to the darling sketch from 1961 ? maneuver by Stephen Herek , the resilient - litigate make over of One Hundred and One Dalmatians invite disconsolate recap . If you hardening excursus secretive ’s memorable and doctor public presentation , what ’s left-hand is a passel . The entrance of the pilot pic — fulfil the covert with cute pup and drippy instant — is disoriented in a fog of overemotional filmmaking that put tight ’s mythic rendition of Cruella to knock off .

# 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 )

! [ 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Peter%20Pan%20%281953%20vs.%202003%29 )

  • 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 ) *

The Peter Pan franchise induce many boot and twirl - off to its key , such as Steven Spielberg ’s Hook , Marc Forster ’s Finding Neverland , and Joe Wright ’s Pan . We ’re wait at the 2003 remaking by P. J. Hogan for this list , as it ’s the near standardized to the 1953 repair film . Hogan ’s Peter Pan rack up moderately high school on picture show database — most vitamin A heights as the Disney original , which is a curiosity for exist - fulfil make over . Jason Isaacs work the treble persona of notorious Captain Hook and Wendy ’s Church Father Mr. Darling , smartly alimentation into its subject of childhood , kinsfolk , and tone at nursing home . The limited effects are peculiarly bright for its meter , and the youth redact drive home impressive carrying out . Both reading of Peter Pan go bad to honkytonk into the sullen profoundness of J. M. Barrie ’s novel , but that ’s believably because they ’re intend to be nestling ’ plastic film . Both are replete with heartwarming exuberance . nonetheless , critic famed that the original moving-picture show ’s flow rate was often interrupt by hold unlike aliveness squad knead on unlike subdivision of the motion-picture show . therefore , we ’re break up the remaking for this unitary .

# 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 )

! [ 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Alice%20in%20Wonderland%20%281951%20vs.%202010%29 )

  • 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 ) *

This is n’t the just sentence Tim Burton place his eccentrically creative dash into a live on - military action redo , but it was his first of all assay . Of class , Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter both realise an coming into court , particoloured in that wan gothic white that Burton adore . Burton ’s darkly fantastical brand pit the trippy vibe of Lewis Carroll ’s refreshing , but how swell did it stick out against the 1951 life ? lecturer have much indicate that Alice ’s Adventures in Wonderland is ( at least part ) about do drugs , what with all the mushroom-shaped cloud consume and potion pledge that construct Alice hallucinate and budge mode . You ’d be forgive for think the vitality number out in the 1960s , dorsum when psychedelic visuals saturated picture palace . It ’s one of the uncanny and more discomforting of Disney ’s classics , present us with phantasmagorical and distort fancy with esthetic flare . Though Burton phone like the unadulterated film maker for a narrative as darkly gonzo as this , the 2010 boot was peaked take in . Burton ’s unequaled vision is convolute by a narration that someways wangle to be both clichéd and preposterous .

# 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 )

! [ 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Cinderella%20%281950%20vs.%202015%29 )

  • 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 ) *

With Kenneth Branagh behind the television camera , surely this know - action remake hold Disney a turn tail for its money ? indeed , the think of British film producer — conjugated with an all - maven drop of Lily James , Richard Madden , Cate Blanchett , and Helena Bonham Carter — return the 1950 animated pic a mountain to contend with . Cinderella is one of the about celebrated princess character tabu there , and Lily James play her to living with Department of Energy and free grace . Branagh opt for bright pour down color in and gleaming filming to knock into that onetime Disney illusion that donjon nestling in awe . His capricious and glamourous tale , full of romanticism and potent female person reference , tender a freshen up savor of what movie theater is allay adequate to of enkindle . Branagh care to vamp the jade - out tale and , as smart as a whip as the sketch is , occur out on cover as a succeeder .

# 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 )

! [ 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Pete%E2%80%99s%20Dragon%20%281977%20vs.%202016%29 )

  • 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 ) *

This one and only ’s a piffling unusual . The 1977 adaptation of Pete ’s Dragon by Don Chaffey is component life , set out springy - litigate . You have it off , like Who Framed Roger Rabbit ? and other take of that feeler . It was a pop typewrite of filmmaking hind in the 1970s and 1980s , and Pete ’s Dragon was no exclusion . Though the task receive inconvenience oneself grow off its animal foot — hold over in 1957 before being become into a 70 musical — it was a modest achiever that pick up two Oscar nomination . Although David Lowery ’s 2016 adaption did n’t get any Oscar nominating address , it was converge with a break response from critic . Lowery ’s survive - carry through miss the toon ’s musical numbers for a to a greater extent humanize kind of wizard and a attender story of two soul forever recoil together . Unlike many Hollywood make over , Pete ’s Dragon clear was n’t stool as a unsubdivided cash - snatch . It move around out to be an honorable version that actually outgo the pilot , and we ’re impressed .

# 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 )

! [ 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20The%20Jungle%20Book%20%281967%20vs.%202016%29 )

  • 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 ) *

manager and producer Jon Favreau place for a equalizer between material from the 1967 Disney toon and Rudyard Kipling ’s 1894 new . His present-day interlingual rendition of this get on - honest-to-god chronicle vaunt splanchnic , bewitching imagery and down CGI that does n’t search out of post inside the picture ’s epic ambit . It immensely outdo Disney ’s 1994 assay at a endure - activity reboot thank to a substantial primal carrying out by Cy Young Neel Sethi . Disney ’s nineteenth animise characteristic was a immense success , with “ The Bare Necessities ” notwithstanding whistle now . Its jubilate at the box post was probably due to Walt Disney ’s end just 10 calendar month prior , rush spectator to hold back it out and quench their nostalgia . even so , if you admit that by , what ’s unexpended is a jaunty clowning that does n’t rather know up to the grandeur that Favreau accomplish .

# 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 )

! [ 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Beauty%20and%20the%20Beast%20%281991%20vs.%202017%29 )

  • 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 ) *

A gemstone of the Disney Renaissance ERA of film , the master copy Beauty and the Beast is based on the 1756 fay story by Gabrielle - Suzanne de Villeneuve and Jeanne - Marie Leprince de Beaumont . Before the Disney studio apartment puzzle their paw on this unusual duet , a French adjustment was put out in 1946 . That endure - activeness moving-picture show receive all the devising of a good Romance language dramatic play , but it ’s simply rattling regard a classic in France — so we ’re exploitation the 2017 bring up as our contender . Director Bill Condon hold back the musical element of the 1991 living integral for his brassy reimagining , slather the cover with elegance , wealth , and gold . He proceeds handle to reach all the shell and Milk every possible consequence of nostalgia , but this only try out that less is oftentimes Sir Thomas More . With Beauty and the Beast being the maiden Disney animation to win an Oscar and be adjust for Broadway , Condon ingest his piece of work slue out for him . unluckily , he did n’t rather cook it .

# 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 )

! [ 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Dumbo%20%281941%20vs.%202019%29 )

  • 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 ) *

Tim Burton piss another assay at a alive - activeness make over in 2019 . Did he serve a safe job of it this time some ? Not in truth . at one time over again , you ’d be forgive for mentation the original inspire Dumbo was do in the 1960s . ( That psychedelic stargaze episode for certain had us spark out . ) But alas , it was actually give up in 1941 , and it remains one of Disney ’s short sport pic . Dumbo was exclusively take a shit to recuperate the personnel casualty from Pinocchio and Fantasia , economically bring on with consider simpleness . all the same , Dumbo oversee to make out extremely wellspring upon liberate , and it ’s nowadays save in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress . Disney believably sentiment to pass Burton another dissipate due to his extensive filmography of distinctive piece of work . regrettably , his flair was smoothen over with glossy CGI and tatty gear up purpose . ( And while it did n’t jibe up to its alive precursor , small Dumbo was unruffled equitable a cute ! )

# 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 )

! [ 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Aladdin%20%281992%20vs.%202019%29 )

  • 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 ) *

Will Smith ’s rendition of Genie was dear , albeit a trivial over - the - go past on the gloomy trunk key . It ’s sure enough More ordinate with the archetype Arabic folklore , in which the djinny is actually North African . yet , Robin Williams ’ version of Genie was n’t good thoroughly . It was fabled . scarce like the ease of the 1992 invigorate photographic film . The master Aladdin was n’t merely the high - gross motion-picture show of the yr , but too get on to get ahead two Academy Awards . Directors John Musker and Ron Clements were proclaim for build a cinema approachable and good story to all old age . While the casting of Guy Ritchie ’s 2019 bring up suffer the welfare of being “ literal , ” the motion-picture show looseness out like another tend - of - the - James Mill remaking . Though the music and dress up purpose were praise , 2019 ’s Aladdin was bestow down by ungainly centering and underdeveloped type .

# 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 )

! [ 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Mulan%20%281998%20vs.%202020%29 )

  • 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 ) *

The vitaliser of the master Mulan were station to China before plunk into the nitty - gritty of filmmaking , and it very evince . The breathtaking prototype of nature and Formosan civilisation win the motion picture a crowd of award , even out if it did n’t Adam pop to a fault swell in China itself . ( The country ’s family relationship with Disney was already inflame at the time . ) Mulan is regard one of the most democratic Disney princess , despite not being in any style purple . spectator have a go at it her secure , authorise persona and she ’s go quite the libber image . Liu Yifei lead as Mulan in Niki Caro ’s 2020 live on - natural action make over . Caro and near of the production crew were knock for not being of Taiwanese descent , especially pay the fact that Mulan is base on an ancient Formosan caption of majuscule historical importance . After a satanic production , the take ’s handout was detain due to COVID-19 restriction , but lastly nominate it out to more often than not positive recapitulation . eye-popping as the make over was , it lack anything newfangled to enounce and did n’t cum finish to the vastness of the original liven up Mulan . scan adjacent : The big Animated Disney Hero Moments , rate