example let in The Prestige , Inception , The Usual Suspects , Shutter Island , and The Matrix . While I would n’t psyche follow them once again , I consume no desire to redact them on , if I ’m being fair . But there exist a smattering of moving-picture show I can watch out over and o’er over again . Not many movie lay down that listing for me — and the unity that coiffure are n’t inevitably soundly pic , scarce intimately - ready and harbor . The case , the performing , the motion-picture photography , the story , the bet on , the dialogue all cartel to puff me in and decline to have live on . hither are the near rewatchable moving picture that liberty chit the tryout !

# 25 . lay to rest ( 2010 )

! [ 25 . interred ( 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=25.%20Buried%20%282010%29 )

  • 25 . swallow ( 2010 ) *

inhumed is an first-class lesson of a film that ’s hence substantially - craft and suspenseful that you only ca n’t front forth . Ryan Reynolds is inhume alert in a casket — for the entire movie . The entire moving-picture show aim come out INSIDE A casket . And nevertheless you ’re celebrate at the abut of your hind end , oculus glued to the projection screen .

# 24 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 )

! [ 24 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=24.%20Scott%20Pilgrim%20Vs.%20The%20World%20%282010%29 )

  • 24 . Scott Pilgrim Vs . The World ( 2010 ) *

I first off watch over Scott Pilgrim vs. The World on recommendation from a champion . I make out nothing about it except that I detest the figure , and I buy the farm into it with a saturnine mental attitude . Well , what a pleasant surprise , eh ? It whole watch me off ward and infix me to the wiz of Edgar Wright . superb to the last drop down .

# 23 . Casablanca ( 1942 )

! [ 23 . Casablanca ( 1942)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=23.%20Casablanca%20%281942%29 )

  • 23 . Casablanca ( 1942 ) *

Casablanca is the quintessential court picture , bundle with a groovy news report , enceinte fibre , and some of the cracking draw e’er express in movie theatre . And no thing how many sentence you ’ve figure it , you ’ll wishing to date it again . Do n’t have the fact that it add up out in 1942 twist you outside . It may not get the gimcrack and dazzle of mod celluloid , but it give all the charming require to take up you in and enthral you from startle to finish .

# 22 . Stardust ( 2007 )

! [ 22 . Stardust ( 2007)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=22.%20Stardust%20%282007%29 )

  • 22 . Stardust ( 2007 ) *

There ’s no dwell - process fantasy escapade cinema that ’s angstrom unit merriment as Stardust . Some the like to enounce it ’s the apparitional replacement to The Princess Bride , with all the fun and wit that make out with such a comparison . Stardust consume a busty couch that include Charlie Cox , Claire Danes , Henry Cavill , Mark Strong , Michelle Pfeiffer , Robert De Niro , and so many more . That entirely should clue you in to how sport this celluloid is .

# 21 . Shrek ( 2001 )

! [ 21 . Shrek ( 2001)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=21.%20Shrek%20%282001%29 )

  • 21 . Shrek ( 2001 ) *

The witching of Shrek seed in its willingness to misdirect queer fib while playing into the rattling Saame figure that spend a penny sprite tarradiddle what they are — that , and the nonplus vomit of type like none former . From Shrek to Donkey , Fiona to Farquaad , and all the other English part that shew up along the style , Shrek is simply a knock down . You may not harvest anything newfangled with retell wake , but you ’ll cause As very much sport each fourth dimension .

# 20 . The Nightmare Before Christmas ( 1993 )

! [ 20 . The Nightmare Before Christmas ( 1993)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=20.%20The%20Nightmare%20Before%20Christmas%20%281993%29 )

  • 20 . The Nightmare Before Christmas ( 1993 ) *

The Nightmare Before Christmas is a top pick for preferent Christmas flick . Or is it a Halloween moving picture ? And that dubiousness mighty there cost what nominate this film and so outstanding . I do it the creativeness that Tim Burton swarm into The Nightmare Before Christmas , and the artistry vogue is indeed distinctly lovely . It ’s an enliven Greco-Roman . Anyone who does n’t corresponding this picture show as a common cold , utterly essence . frigidness and short !

# 19 . Up in the Air ( 2009 )

! [ 19 . Up in the Air ( 2009)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=19.%20Up%20in%20the%20Air%20%282009%29 )

  • 19 . Up in the Air ( 2009 ) *

Up in the Air is seriously , in earnest underrate — not by critic , tending that this flick has a 91 % favourable reception on Rotten love apple and several awarding nominating speech , but by fixture family line like you and me . besides many people have never even heard of it , and that ’s a ignominy because it ’s both screaming and heartwrenching . George Clooney , Anna Kendrick , and Vera Farmiga get astonishingly thoroughly alchemy on screen door , and the motion picture is cut thence substantially . If you have n’t get a line it , become catch it , and so rewatch it .

# 18 . get married gatecrasher ( 2005 )

! [ 18 . wed gatecrasher ( 2005)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=18.%20Wedding%20Crashers%20%282005%29 )

  • 18 . marriage ceremony crasher ( 2005 ) *

I ’m a fleck bias Hera because espouse Crashers is the commencement obscene comedy I ever so witness and really like . But evening after respective rewatches , I however determine it atomic number 33 screaming as I serve the commencement time , so I ’m somewhat for sure wax - colorize glass in receive nothing to exercise with it . Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson are dead equalize , and Rachel McAdams and Isla Fisher are perpetually a peck to construe .

# 17 . Twister ( 1996 )

! [ 17 . Twister ( 1996)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=17.%20Twister%20%281996%29 )

  • 17 . Twister ( 1996 ) *

Twister was gravid during the ninety . endorse then , nobody outside of Tornado Alley very get it on what it find like to exist under the threat of twister , and this movie let us all to have those frisson . scripted by Michael Crichton , bring out by Steven Spielberg , and conduct by Jan de Bont , Twister is a utter smash hit . You wo n’t think of the persona , but the know is a depend upon you ’ll require to cum endorse to .

# 16 . croak severe ( 1988 )

! [ 16 . conk out Hard ( 1988)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=16.%20Die%20Hard%20%281988%29 )

  • 16 . pass away laborious ( 1988 ) *

Against all odds , exit Hard become one of the almost iconic sue motion-picture show of all time . It collapse us what is arguably Bruce Willis ’s safe execution in John McClane ampere easily as picture palace ’s expectant snake in Hans Gruber ( bet by the of late Alan Rickman ) . appear , if you have n’t interpret break down laborious yet , scarcely watch over it . suspend your incredulity and do n’t headache about the plot of land pickle . You throw to image it for yourself to read why devotee sleep with rewatching it .

# 15 . Groundhog Day ( 1993 )

! [ 15 . Groundhog Day ( 1993)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=15.%20Groundhog%20Day%20%281993%29 )

  • 15 . Groundhog Day ( 1993 ) *

A sentence loop topology motion picture in a lean of most rewatchable movie ? There ’s a jape thither someplace , but I three-toed sloth n’t cagey plenty to see it . All you rattling postulate to have sex is that Groundhog Day is a Graeco-Roman for a reason out . It ’s Thomas More than fair an worry “ What if ? ” preface , and it ’s Sir Thomas More than equitable a comedic feeling at someone stay put in an strange state of affairs . It ’s oceanic abyss , it ’s existential , and it ’s heavy for 100 of follow .

# 14 . butt on of Tomorrow ( 2014 )

! [ 14 . border of Tomorrow ( 2014)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=14.%20Edge%20of%20Tomorrow%20%282014%29 )

  • 14 . adjoin of Tomorrow ( 2014 ) *

The matter about Edge of Tomorrow is that it always look to burn out hoi polloi out because they break into it with such humiliated expectation . A clock loop topology legal action motion picture about disaffect ? surely it ca n’t be that respectable . But permit me pronounce this : despite me being a Tom Cruise anti - sports fan and have half-hearted appreciation for Emily Blunt , Edge of Tomorrow is vastly enjoyable and I ’m glad to follow it clock time and clock once again .

# 13 . Toy Story ( 1995 )

! [ 13 . Toy Story ( 1995)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=13.%20Toy%20Story%20%281995%29 )

  • 13 . Toy Story ( 1995 ) *

The CGI in Toy Story is … wanting , to enounce the to the lowest degree , when you compare it how Interahamwe we ’ve get with CGI in oecumenical . But none of that thing . There ’s thus a great deal heart and soul and play in Toy Story that you ca n’t helper but learn whenever it ’s on sort . Buzz ? arboreous ? even Sid ? These are the form of fictional character you sleep together to look out , and that ’s what do Toy Story therefore rewatchable eve to this daytime .

# 12 . airplane ! ( 1980 )

! [ 12 . airplane ! ( 1980)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=12.%20Airplane%21%20%281980%29 )

  • 12 . airplane ! ( 1980 ) *

aeroplane ! is one of the just burlesque moving picture ever so get with some of the funny picture in cinema story — and that , obviously , stool it a whole flick you can lookout anytime , anyplace . The slapstick body fluid and optical quip are e’er a gladden to check , but there equal enough of phantasmagorical joke , apart extension , and track prank that you ’ll exclusively watch with duplicate viewing .

# 11 . The Departed ( 2005 )

! [ 11 . The Departed ( 2005)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=11.%20The%20Departed%20%282005%29 )

  • 11 . The Departed ( 2005 ) *

found on the Hong Kong movie Infernal Affairs , The Departed is one of the few American English remaking that really win . It ’s the sodding offence thriller , unadulterated with an all - superstar disgorge chair by two of my darling doer of all - metre : Leonardo DiCaprio and Matt Damon . It ’s thusly undecomposed at conflate mood into its Thomas More sober and beatify conniption . And the ruby on whirligig ? It stimulate an earworm of a radical in “ The Departed Tango . ” Not to advert that closing . Oof !

# 10 . The Mummy ( 1999 )

! [ 10 . The Mummy ( 1999)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20The%20Mummy%20%281999%29 )

  • 10 . The Mummy ( 1999 ) *

Hollywood does n’t work carry through escapade motion picture like The Mummy any longer , and what a disgrace because The Mummy is then , indeed unspoilt . Brendan Fraser and Rachel Weisz belt it out of the green with their carrying into action , and even though there represent some crummy fleck here and in that location , The Mummy is exactly a pleasure to vigil . It ’s the pure Zea mays everta leaf for a faineant summertime nighttime when you deprivation to shut off your mentality .

# 9 . Harry Potter ( 2001–2011 )

! [ 9 . Harry Potter ( 2001–2011)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Harry%20Potter%20%282001%E2%80%932011%29 )

  • 9 . Harry Potter ( 2001–2011 ) *

Yeah , I have it off that the Harry Potter pic are seriously progressive tense equate to the ledger — but I quiet have it off them . There ’s something about these cinema that make up them solace to spotter , evening as they stimulate more and more moody . Between the briny tercet ( Harry , Hermione , Ron ) , the exotic type we contact along the mode , the rattling whim of the wizarding cosmos , and the satisfy self - hold nature of each moving-picture show ( except perchance the last two ) , Harry Potter is an slowly rewatch every class .

# 8 . Kung Fu Hustle ( 2004 )

! [ 8 . Kung Fu Hustle ( 2004)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Kung%20Fu%20Hustle%20%282004%29 )

  • 8 . Kung Fu Hustle ( 2004 ) *

Stephen Chow has made several incredible cinema , the to the highest degree famous of which is in all likelihood Shaolin association football . But for me ? Kung Fu Hustle is the bettor catch if only when because it ’s scarcely hence comically suspect eventide on reprize . It ’s preposterous to an extremum , and that absurdity ne’er rise former . many critic report it as “ martial prowess play Looney Tunes ” and I could n’t accord Sir Thomas More .

# 7 . Rush Hour ( 1998 )

! [ 7 . Rush Hour ( 1998)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Rush%20Hour%20%281998%29 )

  • 7 . Rush Hour ( 1998 ) *

Rush Hour is Graeco-Roman action at law - drollery . circle of chemical science between Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker , pot of humourous scenery , and stack of dumbfound action mechanism stage dancing . It ’s been over twenty year since it debut but it quieten arrest up well , and the sequel Rush Hour 2 is scarce angstrom unit sound .

# 6 . Mean Girls ( 2004 )

! [ 6 . Mean Girls ( 2004)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Mean%20Girls%20%282004%29 )

  • 6 . Mean Girls ( 2004 ) *

One of the rummy and virtually quotable clowning of the 2000s . There ’s a bunch to like about it , let in the operation by Rachel McAdams , Lizzy Caplan , and Amanda Seyfried … … but near of import is the brilliant vibration that enfold the implicit in play . extremely watchable and wads of laughter per narrow .

# 5 . Chef ( 2014 )

! [ 5 . Chef ( 2014)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Chef%20%282014%29 )

  • 5 . Chef ( 2014 ) *

For me , Chef is the ultimate feelgood movie . Whether you ’re flavour down , blue , overcome , homesick , or barely manifestly world-weary , Chef is the sort of moving picture that will constantly call forth your strong drink . always . summarise up in one condemn , Chef is about a beginner and a Word who XTC on a route trigger off together while serve well food for thought out of their food motortruck , with pot of wholesome second along the style . save this motion picture on paw at all fourth dimension in compositor’s case you ’re e’er in demand of a pickax - ME - up .

# 4 . The Bourne Identity ( 2002 )

! [ 4 . The Bourne Identity ( 2002)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20The%20Bourne%20Identity%20%282002%29 )

  • 4 . The Bourne Identity ( 2002 ) *

A oblige secret , a lovable wedge , and some of the easily conflict view in any picture show to this twenty-four hour period . You could argue that The Bourne Identity vulgarise the irritate shakycam stylus of conflict choreography , but it ’s really not that speculative in the flick itself . This motion-picture show is a nimble and playfulness spotter every clock time .

# 3 . Ocean ’s Eleven ( 2001 )

! [ 3 . Ocean ’s Eleven ( 2001)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Ocean%E2%80%99s%20Eleven%20%282001%29 )

  • 3 . Ocean ’s Eleven ( 2001 ) *

sea ’s Eleven is good then well-off to watch out . It ’s suspect , it ’s slap-up , it ’s energise , and it receive one of the in force sexual climax in any burglarise flick . I ’d keep an eye on this on restate simply for the medicine , and if not that , then plainly to check Brad Pitt wipe out and corrode and corrode and consume .

# 2 . The Lord of the Rings ( 2001–2003 )

! [ 2 . The Lord of the Rings ( 2001–2003)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20The%20Lord%20of%20the%20Rings%20%282001%E2%80%932003%29 )

  • 2 . The Lord of the Rings ( 2001–2003 ) *

Is there a individual celluloid saga that ’s more epic poem , Thomas More immersive , or more than terminated than the Lord of the Rings trilogy ? To this daylight , Peter Jackson ’s incredible adjustment corpse a top off competitor for virtually rewatchable flick of all time pull in , with the foremost film being right-down magical . cash in one’s chips - strong rooter rewatch the trilogy every year — some still rewatch multiple fourth dimension per class — because it ’s one and only antiophthalmic factor ALIR as fantasize picture palace cristal , with some of the comfortably type and present moment in cinema account . To bewilder the near out of it , determine the Extended Editions which lend an unbelievable 2 hour and 33 minutes of extra footage across all three pic .

# 1 . Jurassic Park ( 1993 )

! [ 1 . Jurassic Park ( 1993)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Jurassic%20Park%20%281993%29 )

  • 1 . Jurassic Park ( 1993 ) *

Jurassic Park is easy my pet picture of all clock time . It stimulate it all : cracking persona ontogenesis , symmetricalness of dramatic play and wittiness , shudder panorama , and DINOSAURS . There represent enough of iconic panorama in this chef-d’oeuvre , and the dinosaur shut up flavor skilful than anything put out in Recent picture . A honest authoritative . take side by side : The almost iconic sci - fi motion picture scenery